Let's start with some things, put in a disorderly way, which I have a long thread that binds them.
On January 22 in El Salvador and 'commemorated the 79th anniversary of the uprising and indigenous campoesina, severely repressed, cost' 32,000 dead in just a few days.
just in the city 'of Izalco's army' massacred more 'than 10,000 people.
The detonator of the insurgency: poverty and the worsening economic crisis. Following the repression communities' indigenous not only had to change his name but who was identified as the risk of death. The lands were concentrated
fazenderos in few hands, so 'El Salvador became one of those pro-American countries where one percent of the population controls 90% of wealth.
It took decades of political work and a guerrilla war lasting years to put an end to this affair.
in Guatemala in 1994 ended a decades-long war that cost 300,000 dead and one million refugees.
One of the areas where fighting is more 'has been one of the community' in San Juan Cotzal.
Today, those lands were granted by the government disattedendo ENEL, in this way, one of the peace agreements. the availability 'of resources and territory remains part of the community' who lived there.
At this time the company 'Italian does not show any interest in anything or negotiate' with the inhabitants of that area. So far the demonstrations are peaceful, in an area that still shows the scars of war, and with a people that has' bravely fought for years and which has historical memory for other forms of opposition.
Here in Chiapas, the conflict between government and communities' indigenous revolves around the same issues, the availability 'of resources and their use with, in this,' the clash between two different ways of understanding the 'civilization' .
one hand the intensive exploitation of the territories with the expulsion of residents, the other the defense of life styles and traditions that do not accord with the interests of multinational corporations.
We come now to what we read in Italian newspapers for what 'is happening in North Africa.
The desire for democracy, a society 'more' free etc.etc.
I have many doubts that it is "only" about it. Those who have moved are unemployed underclass, farmers and companies' "civilian who apparently have not hitherto enjoyed, however, that the distribution of wealth in that part of the world 'prerogative of a select few.
There' a army of producers and workers with stable employment conditions' cause they do not exist. There are people who arranges every day and sees before one's eyes what it means power have and what is not. The symbols of wealth in this material are obvious.
To return here, the basic salary and the law and 'of 50 pesos per day. One euro is worth 16. Do yourself a bit 'accounts. At the same time show as billboards, with 1200 pesos per month, you can 'have a mobile package. parade in front of those signs of dispossessed masses. This
'that partly rescued by a revolt of Mexico at the Egyptian, in my view, two elements
1 - that remittances are an important part of the wealth of this country
2 - the choice for a political struggle "made by the Mexican left-wing organizations
long will it last '? Why' this e' la domanda. Fino a quando pensate che possa durare? State pianificando una societa' in cui la ricchezza si concentrera' sempre di piu'. Questo anche nella ricca Europa. Pensate che questo sia il modello vincente? Auguri, perche' quando il vento si soleva lo fa d'improvviso e spazza via un sacco di merda.
0 comments:
Post a Comment